TL;DR
Get the latest gadgets delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Interest in how video game design principles inform mainstream user experience work is spiking in 2019, though no single event has been confirmed as the trigger. Long-established practices — onboarding, feedback loops, progressive disclosure — are widely shared between games and product UX.
Interest in video game design as a source of inspiration for user experience (UX) work is rising noticeably in 2019, according to search and editorial coverage patterns around the topic. No single product launch, conference talk, or publication has been confirmed as the trigger for the surge — but the underlying subject matter is well established, and the renewed attention reflects a genuine, long-running exchange between game design and mainstream software design.
The core idea drawing attention is that games and productivity software solve overlapping problems. Successful games must teach players complex systems without manuals, provide continuous feedback, and keep users engaged over long periods. These are the same challenges facing designers of apps, websites, and enterprise tools, which is why UX practitioners have borrowed from games for years.
Several techniques are long established in both fields. Onboarding through play — teaching a user interface by guiding them through simple early tasks rather than static tutorials — originated in game design and is now standard in consumer apps. Progressive disclosure, where complexity is revealed gradually as a user demonstrates competence, mirrors how games introduce mechanics level by level. Immediate, multi-sensory feedback — visual, auditory, and haptic responses to every action — keeps users oriented and confident that their input registered. Motivation structures, including progress indicators, streaks, achievements, and visible advancement, have been adapted into mainstream products under the broader banner of gamification.
What has changed is not the existence of these practices but the visibility of the conversation around them. In 2019, design publications, conference programs, and product teams are discussing game-derived methods more frequently, treating games as a reference discipline for UX rather than a niche entertainment concern. The precise reason for the timing is not confirmed.
Why Game Literacy Matters for Designers
For readers who work in product design or build software, the trend signals a practical opportunity. Games represent decades of large-scale, high-stakes usability testing: titles that fail to onboard players within minutes lose them, and commercial pressure has refined techniques for teaching, guiding, and retaining users. That accumulated experience is a resource designers can study directly rather than rediscover through costly iteration.
The trend also matters because it reframes what counts as a design education. Interfaces popularized by games — health bars, minimaps, inventory grids, radial menus, checkpoint systems — have already migrated into dashboards, project management tools, and fitness apps. As gaming audiences have broadened across demographics, fluency in game conventions has become a broadly shared design vocabulary, which lowers the learning curve for products that adopt it.
There is a cautionary dimension as well. Motivation mechanics borrowed from games, such as variable rewards and streak systems, have drawn criticism when applied to products in ways that critics describe as manipulative. The renewed attention to game-inspired UX includes this debate, not just the celebratory side.
A Decades-Long Design Exchange
Borrowing between games and productivity software is not new. Early graphical interfaces and games evolved together on personal computers in the 1980s, and direct-manipulation interaction — clicking and dragging objects on screen — appeared in both categories from the start. In the 2000s, the rise of casual and social games pushed game studios toward mass-market usability, sharpening their onboarding techniques just as consumer web products faced the same audience.
The 2010s brought the gamification wave, in which points, badges, and leaderboards were added to non-game products, sometimes effectively and often superficially. Design commentary since then has shifted from adding game trappings to studying game underlying design logic — how games sequence difficulty, communicate state, and reward mastery. The 2019 spike in interest appears to continue that more sophisticated conversation, though the specific catalyst remains unidentified.
What Is Driving the 2019 Spike
The immediate cause of the increased interest is not confirmed. Plausible contributing factors include the continued mainstreaming of gaming across age groups, growth in design-team hiring from entertainment industries, and high-profile apps visibly adopting game-style interfaces — but none of these has been verified as the specific trigger.
It is also unclear whether the trend reflects a lasting shift in UX practice or a cyclical wave of editorial attention, as occurred during earlier gamification booms. No authoritative industry data quantifying adoption of game-inspired UX methods in 2019 was available for this report.
Where the Conversation Likely Goes
Observers of the design industry can expect the discussion to continue at UX conferences and in design publications through 2019 and beyond, particularly around onboarding and engagement measurement. Watch for concrete adoption signals — job postings seeking game design experience for product roles, and mainstream apps shipping explicit game-derived interaction patterns.
The ethical debate over motivational mechanics is also likely to intensify as regulators and platform policies pay closer attention to persuasive design. Whether game-inspired UX matures into standard practice or remains a specialist interest will depend on demonstrated results, which are not yet systematically documented.
Key Questions
What do video games actually contribute to UX design?
Established contributions include learning-by-doing onboarding, progressive disclosure of complexity, immediate feedback for every action, and motivation structures such as progress indicators and achievements.
Is game-inspired UX the same as gamification?
No. Gamification adds surface elements like points and badges to non-game products. Game-inspired UX more broadly studies how games teach, guide, and retain users, of which reward systems are only one part.
Why is interest in this topic rising in 2019?
Search and editorial attention is up, but the specific trigger is unconfirmed. Broader gaming audiences and visible adoption of game-style interfaces in mainstream apps are plausible factors, not verified causes.
Are there downsides to borrowing from game design?
Critics have raised concerns that motivational mechanics such as variable rewards and streaks can be used manipulatively. The 2019 conversation includes this critique alongside the practical benefits.
Which products already use game-derived UX patterns?
Long-standing examples include progress bars, achievement systems, step-by-step onboarding flows, and dashboard layouts resembling game heads-up displays — patterns now common across consumer and productivity apps.
Source: hn
Evergreen bestsellers Picks
bestsellers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
