TL;DR
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Sam Altman testified that Elon Musk once proposed passing control of OpenAI to his children. This revelation sheds light on Musk’s intentions and influence over the company’s future. The development is part of a broader lawsuit challenging OpenAI’s corporate structure.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testified today that Elon Musk once proposed passing control of OpenAI to his children, a statement that has implications for Musk’s influence over the organization and its safety commitments.
During a court hearing on May 12, 2026, Altman described a 2017 conversation where Musk suggested that, in the event of his death, OpenAI should be handed over to his children. Altman expressed concern over Musk’s focus on controlling the for-profit arm of OpenAI, which contrasted with the organization’s mission to prevent AI from falling into the wrong hands. Altman also criticized Musk’s management style at OpenAI, stating that Musk’s approach demotivated key researchers and damaged the company’s culture. The testimony forms part of a lawsuit initiated by Musk, alleging that OpenAI’s founders ‘stole a charity’ by creating a for-profit subsidiary. Musk’s lawyers contend that Musk was kept informed of investments and organizational changes, including a significant investment from Microsoft in 2018. Altman’s testimony highlights ongoing tensions over governance, safety, and Musk’s role in OpenAI’s development.
Why It Matters
This revelation matters because it sheds light on Musk’s intentions for OpenAI, raising questions about his influence and the company’s safety protocols. Musk’s proposal to pass control to his children suggests a desire for long-term control, which could impact how OpenAI manages AI safety and governance. The testimony also underscores broader concerns about the influence of individual founders on AI organizations and their commitment to safety versus commercial interests. For the public and regulators, understanding Musk’s role is crucial as AI technology becomes increasingly powerful and central to global innovation and security.
Products Worth Considering
DJI Osmo Mobile 8 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer for Phones
Samsung 34-Inch Odyssey G5 Ultra-Wide Curved Gaming Monitor
Logitech MX Mechanical Wireless Illuminated Keyboard, Clicky
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Elon Musk was a co-founder of OpenAI and served on its board until he left in 2018 amid disagreements over management and safety priorities. Since then, Musk has launched competing AI initiatives, including Tesla’s AI efforts and xAI. The lawsuit filed by Musk alleges that OpenAI’s founders misappropriated charitable assets to develop a for-profit entity, a claim refuted by OpenAI’s leadership. Altman’s testimony provides insight into internal discussions from 2017, a pivotal period when OpenAI was seeking funding and defining its mission. Musk’s influence on OpenAI’s early governance and safety protocols has been a point of scrutiny, especially as the organization’s assets have grown to an estimated $200 billion.
“Musk suggested that, in the event of his death, OpenAI should pass to his children.”
— Sam Altman
“He had demotivated some of our most key researchers. He required Greg and Ilya to make a list of accomplishments and rank them, which did huge damage to the culture.”
— Sam Altman
What Remains Unclear
It is not yet clear how much influence Musk’s proposal to pass control to his children would have had on OpenAI’s actual governance or safety policies. The full scope of Musk’s intentions and how they might affect the company’s future remains under dispute. Details about internal decision-making processes during that period are still emerging.
What’s Next
The court proceedings are ongoing, and further testimonies may shed additional light on Musk’s involvement and intentions. Legal developments, including potential rulings on the lawsuit’s claims, are expected in the coming months. OpenAI’s leadership may also clarify their governance and safety strategies in response to these revelations.
Key Questions
What did Elon Musk propose regarding OpenAI’s control?
Musk suggested that, in the event of his death, OpenAI should be passed to his children, according to Altman’s testimony.
Why does Musk’s proposal matter?
It raises questions about Musk’s desire for long-term control over OpenAI and how that might influence safety and governance decisions.
How does this impact the lawsuit against OpenAI?
The revelation supports Musk’s claim that the organization’s founders misappropriated charitable assets, though the full legal implications are still unfolding.
What is the current status of the legal case?
The case is ongoing, with court hearings continuing through 2026. Further testimonies are expected to clarify Musk’s role and intentions.
Could Musk’s influence affect OpenAI’s future safety policies?
It remains uncertain, but the revelations suggest that Musk’s ideas and proposals may have played a role in shaping early governance debates, which could influence future policies.
